State ex rel. Fair v. Hamilton
Citations
- 92 Wash. 347
- 159 P. 379
Syllabus
<p>Statutes — Construction—Ambiguity — Intent — Extrinsic Evidence — Justice of Peace — Constables—Term of Office. The ambiguity in 3 Rem. & Bal. Code, § 6533-1, providing for the election of justices of the peace and constables “quadrennially” and limiting the term of office to “two years” after election, admits of extrinsic evidence to ascertain the intent; and the intent to provide a four-year term is clear and will be given effect, where it appears from the senate and house journals that the bill as originally introduced provided for elections “biennially,” which was by amendment changed to “quadrennially,” showing that the omission to change the term also was an inadvertence.</p> <p>Justices of the Peace — Term—Constitutional and Statutory Provisions — Counties—Officers. Const., art. 11, §§ 4 and 5, requiring uniformity in county government, and art. 6, § 8, requiring county officers to be elected biennially, apply only to executive and administrative county officers and not to justices of the peace and constables, since they properly belong to the judicial department of the state and are not county officers.</p> <p>Counties — Officers — Statutes. Const., art. 6, § 8, requiring county officers to be elected biennially, must be construed in connection with art. 11, § 5, conferring power on the legislature to prescribe the duty of county officers and fix their term of office.</p> <p>Statutes — Titles and Subjects. The titles of acts “relating to justices of the peace and constables” in cities having a specified population, and “relating to justices of the peace and constables and the compensation of justices,” in cities of a specified population, are sufficient without being a complete index of the acts.</p> <p>Statutes — Amendments—Construction. An amendatory act relating to the election of justices, quoting parts of the act amended, and containing the word “hereafter,” is not ambiguous as providing for a future election to be held at a past time; since “hereaft
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- looking to proposed and accepted amendments to discern legislative intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Chadwick, Ellis, Fullerton, Morris, Mount
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hama Hama Co. v. Shorelines Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court· 1975-06-13· cited 139×
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1980-07-15· cited 116×
- State v. FramptonWashington Supreme Court· 1981-04-16· cited 97×
- Wagner v. BartzWashington Supreme Court· 1955-08-11· cited 29×
- Barrows v. GarveyArizona Supreme Court· 1948-05-24· cited 18×
- State Ex Rel. Kurtz v. PrattWashington Supreme Court· 1954-08-06· cited 12×
- Nye v. Board of Com'rs of Eddy CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-02-03· cited 12×
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1970-09-24· cited 9×
- Alaska Airlines v. Dep't of Labor & Indus.Washington Supreme Court· 2023-06-29
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1916-06-07· cited 39×
- State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court· 1914-04-25· cited 23×
- Nathan v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1904-04-19· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Matson v. Superior Court for Skagit CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1906-04-04· cited 15×
- McElwain v. AbrahamWashington Supreme Court· 1910-03-25· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Board of Tax Commissioners v. CameronWashington Supreme Court· 1916-03-28· cited 9×
- State ex rel. Hays v. TwichellWashington Supreme Court· 1894-10-06· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.