State ex rel. Everett v. Superior Court

Citations

• 99 Wash. 169

Syllabus

<p>Taxation—Foreclosure — Judgment — Sufficiency. A form for judgment in a tax foreclosure is not objectionable, in that it employs the singular instead of the plural, where that can be changed; nor that it omits recitals of the performance of the duty of officers which would be presumed in any event; nor that it omits recitals of the priority of liens which were established by the judgment or by the law relating to the priority of local assessments; nor that it fails to provide for interest, where the judge indicated that his judgment would provide for the interest.</p> <p>Mandamus—When Lies—To Courts. Mandamus does not lie to compel a judge to sign a certain form where the judge’s return shows that he offered to cure any defects in the form of judgment which he refused to sign.</p>