· 5/26/1994
State Ex Rel. Erickson v. Hill
Citations
- 445 S.E.2d 503
- 191 W. Va. 320
- 1994 W. Va. LEXIS 67
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issuing writ of prohibition because circuit court had abused its discretion in ordering Ms. Erickson to respond to burdensome and oppressive discovery
- granted prohibition to discovery order because it was abusive and oppressive
- granted prohibition to discovery order because it was abusive and oppressive
- regarding disclosure requirements in context of divorce action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Neely
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.