Skip to main content
· 5/26/1994

State Ex Rel. Erickson v. Hill

Citations

  • 445 S.E.2d 503
  • 191 W. Va. 320
  • 1994 W. Va. LEXIS 67

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • issuing writ of prohibition because circuit court had abused its discretion in ordering Ms. Erickson to respond to burdensome and oppressive discovery
  • granted prohibition to discovery order because it was abusive and oppressive
  • granted prohibition to discovery order because it was abusive and oppressive
  • regarding disclosure requirements in context of divorce action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.