State ex rel. Elliott v. Custer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a search of plaintiff’s day planner for notes was reasonable because, despite plaintiff’s protest that its use was personal, a day planner is “a logical place for someone to record such information”
• finding that plaintiff “may have had an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in his personal day planner” that employer searched and seized when “it contained only personal information”
• state police detective did not have an objectively reasonable expectation of privacy in his desk or car

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).