Skip to main content
· 2/27/2024

State ex rel. Eichenberger v. Serrott

Citations

  • 2024 Ohio 718

Syllabus

The magistrate's decision contained no error of law or other defect on its face. Therefore, we adopt as our own the magistrate's decision finding that that the actions sought in relator's complaint have already performed, and therefore he cannot show he is entitled to either an extraordinary writ of mandamus or procedendo. Accordingly, relator's request for a writ of procedendo and/or a writ of mandamus is denied. Complaint dismissed.

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.