Skip to main content
· 3/23/2004

State Ex Rel. Eddy v. Rolf

Citations

  • 145 S.W.3d 429
  • 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 406
  • 2004 WL 555649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that motions for new trial and motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict constitute authorized post-trial motions for purposes of Rule 81.05

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spinden, Ulrich, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.