State Ex Rel. Eckles v. Woolley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reasoning that SAIF is not subject to prohibition of Article XI, section 2, because it is a “public” corporation
• stating that \characterizations in judicial opinions responding to such arguments made in one context are inconclusive on substantially different issues arising in the context of different laws\
• holding that SAIF is a public corporation
• defining public corporation as a municipality or government corporation \created for the administration of public affairs\
• reviewing the Oregon Constitution's diverse use of the word \corporation\ in Article XI as well as the constitution's use of the phrases \municipal corporations\ and \corporations\ for \municipal purposes\
• reviewing the Oregon Constitution’s diverse use of the word “corporation” in Article XI as well as the constitution’s use of the phrases “municipal corporations” and “corporations” for municipal purposes”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).