Skip to main content
· 12/15/1903

State ex rel. Durand v. District Court of the Second Judicial District

Citations

  • 29 Mont. 571
  • 78 P. 1117
  • 1903 Mont. LEXIS 203

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “one who exercises day-to- day control over the employee will be considered as the employer”
  • holding that “one who exercises day-to-day control over the employee will be considered as the employer”
  • holding that ‘one who exercises day-to-day control over the employee will be considered as the employer’
  • holding that ‘one who exercises day-to-day control over the employee will be considered as the employer’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.