State ex rel. Drew v. Myatt
Citations
- 122 La. 974
- 48 So. 425
- 1909 La. LEXIS 628
Syllabus
<p>1. Mandamus (§ 4*) — Remedy by Appeax,.</p> <p>Mandamus is not the remedy, as the complaining defendant (relator here) has a right of appeal.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Mandamus, Cent. Dig. §§ 9-34; Dec. Dig. § 4.*]</p> <p>2. Mandamus (§ 4*) — Othek Adequate Remedy.</p> <p>The judgment and the judicial mortgage collaterally attacked were not absolutely null and void; therefore could not be affected in proceedings by mandamus. Appeal or action of nullity are the remedies.</p> <p>The asserted illegality preceded the signing of the judgment.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other eases, see Mandamus, Cent. Dig. §§ 9-34; Dec. Dig. § 4.*]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
Judges: Breaux
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.