State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. Eggers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Bankers Trust; “the parties contemplated that [the lender] would provide adequate funds to pay for work completed prior to the default.”
• “the parties contemplated that [the bank] would provide adequate funds to pay for work completed prior to the default”
• “To hold otherwise would give the insured [lender] an unwarranted windfall and would place the title insurer in the untenable position of guaranteeing payment of work for which loan funds were never advanced.”
• ‘While [the lender] admittedly was under no obligation to continue funding the project after the default, it seems clear that the parties contemplated that [the lender] would provide adequate funds to pay for work completed prior to the default.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).