Skip to main content
· 3/6/1961

State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Yawn

Citations

  • 127 So. 2d 545
  • 1961 La. App. LEXIS 1814

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “A deviation from competitive bidding will not be countenanced even where there is no evidence of fraud or favoritism.”
  • “A deviation from competitive bidding will not be countenanced even where there is no evidence of fraud or favoritism.”
  • “A deviation from competitive bidding will not be countenanced even where there is no evidence of fraud or favoritism.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Frugé, Hood, Tate

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.