State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Rutledge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that appellant’s weight of the evidence claim failed where he did not argue that court palpably abused its discretion and court properly viewed issue as one of credibility that jury resolved in favor of victim
• \[A] new trial is warranted only when the jury's verdict is so contrary to the evidence that it shocks one's sense of justice and the award of a new trial is imperative so that right may be given another opportunity to prevail.\
• identifying hearing on motions in limine as “pre-trial hearing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).