State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the defendant’s generalized statement about owning everything in an apartment was rendered entirely valueless by the absence of any indication that he knew that the cannabis was there, and by his affirmative statement that he did not know of the cannabis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).