State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Freyer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that because “[the' appellant’s] claim on appeal challenges the legality of his sentence, its review is not abrogated by the entry of his guilty plea.”
• finding that lower court erred in dismissing motion to modify restitution filed 14 months after the judgment of sentence was imposed
• stating that because “[the appellant’s] claim on appeal challenges the legality of his sentence, its review is not abrogated by the entry of his guilty plea.”
• stating that because “[the appellant’s] claim on appeal challenges the legality of his sentence, its review is not abrogated by the entry of his guilty plea.”
• stating that because “[the appellant’s] claim on appeal challenges the legality of his sentence, its review is not abrogated by the entry of his guilty plea.”
• stating that because “[the appellant’s] claim on appeal challenges the legality of his sentence, its review is not abrogated by the entry of his guilty plea.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).