State ex rel. Department of Health v. Chemical Co. of America, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that we had subject matter 20 III (8
• explaining that a modified gag order was appealable, “either because it [was] appealable as a final judgment under the collateral order doctrine . . . or because it functionally amount[ed] to an injunction”
• “We also have jurisdiction of appeals from injunctions ‘concerning proceedings in (murder cases).’” (quoting OCGA § 15-3- 3.1 (a) (2))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).