State ex rel. Delahoussaye v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “federal courts sitting in diversity should apply the law that would be applied by state courts in the State in which the federal diversity court sits so long as the state rule is not ‘incompatible with federal interests”
• declining to allow party to “preemptively” seek to pierce the corporate veil where the complaint “does not allege any wrongdoing by” the named entity “and corporate veil piercing is not a cause of action under Michigan law,” and dismissing for failure to state a claim
• “While the question of whether to grant a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is typically confined to the pleadings, we may take judicial notice of other court proceedings without converting the motion into one for summary judgment.”
• “While the question of whether to grant a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is typically confined to the pleadings, we may take judicial notice of other court proceedings without converting the motion into one for summary judgment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).