State ex rel. Davis v. Saffold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]ssuing a new sentencing order would be a vain act, given that [the defendant] was able to appeal his conviction (albeit unsuccessfully)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mitchell
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-22· cited 18×
• State v. Brown
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-09-13· cited 7×
• State v. O'Neal
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-14· cited 1×
• Dean v. Marquis (Slip Opinion)
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2019-03-19· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Baker
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 500×
• State ex rel. DeWine v. Burge
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-01-27· cited 83×
• State Ex Rel. Harris v. Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas
  Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-04-22· cited 10×
• State v. Davis
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-11-07· cited 5×
• State v. Davis
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-06-07· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Davis v. Saffold
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-29· cited 2×

Other cases named State ex rel. Davis v. Saffold

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• State ex rel. Davis v. Saffold
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-29· cited 2×
• State ex rel. Davis v. Saffold
  Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-06