· 3/31/2021
State ex rel. Dailey v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 1079
Syllabus
Relator's objections were untimely and we decline to address them. We find the magistrate has properly determined the pertinent facts and applied the appropriate law and conclude the magistrate correctly determined that relator's claims are barred by res judicata.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that dual convictions of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of ammunition by a convicted felon violated double jeopardy
- following Boyd on similar facts relating to convictions for possession of a firearm and separate ammunition
- same and remanding for the trial court to vacate the conviction for felon in possession of ammunition because the conviction for felon in possession of a firearm carried a three-year minimum mandatory sentence
- “Although the firearm and the ammunition were found at two separate times, the defendant’s possession of the firearm and the ammunition were not ‘clearly separate in both time and space.’” (quoting Nicholson v. State, 757 So. 2d 1227, 1228 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dorrian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.