Skip to main content
· 12/20/1983

State Ex Rel. Dahl v. Lange

Citations

  • 661 S.W.2d 7
  • 1983 Mo. LEXIS 475

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • refusing to review pre-election constitutional challenges because doing so “could effectively enjoin the amendment from being placed on the ballot because of conjecture that it would be found unconstitutional if passed and adopted by the voters”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higgins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.