State ex rel. Curtis v. Thompson
Citations
- 117 La. 102
- 41 So. 367
- 1906 La. LEXIS 650
Syllabus
<p>1. Parent and Child — Custody oe Child-Evidence.</p> <p>In a controversy over the custody of a minor child, a judgment of divorce alleged but not offered in evidence, cannot be considered in determining the issues.</p> <p>2. Estoppel by Pleadings.</p> <p>A husband who, in suing for a divorce, alleged that there was no issue of the marriage, and that a child born to the wife after she had left the matrimonial domicile was an adulterous bastard, is bound by such allegations, it appearing that a judgment of non-suit only was rendered in said suit.</p> <p>[Ed. Note — For cases in point, see vol. 19, Cent. Dig. Estoppel, §§ 2-5.]</p> <p>3. Parent and Child — Custody.</p> <p>Where, in a suit by an alleged father for the custody of a minor child, he is confronted by his own previous allegations that the child was an adulterous bastard, and his allegations that the physical and moral welfare of the child is seriously endangered -by the neglect or immoral habits of the mother, are not sustained by the evidence, the district judge properly dismissed the action under the provisions of Act No. 79, p. 91, of 1894.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that allegations of “proprietary configurations and data specifications of [plaintiff’s] software” were sufficiently alleged trade secrets
- finding sufficient a reference to “proprietary software programs for administering the 340B program”
- finding plaintiff’s FUTSA claim sufficiently plead where “[plaintiff] has alleged that Defendants misappropriated these trade secrets by using the confidential customer lists to call [plaintiff] customers to persuade them to switch to [defendant] . . . .”
- “[They] each re-allege all the prior allegations of the Complaint and are based on the ‘conversion’ or ‘tak[ing]’ of the same trade secrets and proprietary information as the misappropriation of trade secrets claims.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Land
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.