State ex rel. Crane v. Heinrichs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that although defendants challenging evidence admitted for a non-hearsay purpose “may have been entitled to a limiting instruction regarding the purpose for which the testimony was admitted, none was requested”
• affirming a sentence that combined a term of imprisonment, a suspended sentence, and a conditional exemption from punishment
• within RSA 651:2 a judge has broad discretion to assign different sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).