State ex rel. Corbitt v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Connecticut UFTA sometimes permits damages when transferee either reconveys property and retains no proceeds or - 18 - dissipates property
• where court's decision based on conclusion of law rather than exercise of judicial discretion, review is plenary
• where court’s decision based on conclusion of law rather than exercise of judicial discretion, review is plenary
• where court’s decision based on conclusion of law rather than exercise of judicial discretion, review is plenary
• “[The] UFTA provides protection by allowing creditors to obtain prejudgment relief upon a showing of probable cause.”
• ‘‘although a creditor may recover the value of the asset transferred, such recovery is allowed under [General Statutes] § 52-552i [b] only to the extent that the transfer is voidable under [General Statutes] § 52-552h [a] [1]’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).