Skip to main content
· 4/11/1989

State ex rel. Cooper v. Sports & Health Club, Inc.

Citations

  • 438 N.W.2d 385
  • 1989 Minn. App. LEXIS 418
  • 1989 WL 32625

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the definition of “child custody proceeding” includes CINA proceedings and, therefore, “[t]he court was ... required to have jurisdiction over the subject matter under the UCCJEA[.]”
  • emphasizing that while the juvenile court’s subject matter jurisdiction may be presumed where it exercises jurisdiction over a child, its authority to act in a CINA proceeding is constrained by its “statutorily enumerated powers”
  • “[T]he burden is on the party challenging subject matter jurisdiction to rebut that presumption”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foley, Forsberg, Mulally

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.