State ex rel. Conway v. Weber

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing “the benefit received by the party” rather than “what purpose the land was held open for” in determining the entrant’s legal status”
• rejecting invitee status for a motorist injured at a highway rest stop because the increased highway safety the state achieved by providing such rest stops was only an intangible benefit
• rejecting the public invitee standard that does not “require[] that some type of benefit * * * be conferred on the owner or occupier before a visitor can be considered an invitee”
• rejecting the concept of “public invitee” in deciding that persons utilizing a state highway rest stop are licensees because no economic benefit is conferred to the owner, i.e. the state of Ohio

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).