State ex rel. Conomy v. Rohrer
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5296
Syllabus
Mandamus—Procedendo—Court of appeals correctly dismissed appellant's mandamus claim against common-pleas-court judge presiding over misdemeanor case against appellant because a writ of mandamus will not issue to control how judicial discretion is exercised—Court of appeals correctly dismissed appellant's procedendo claim against judge because judge lacked jurisdiction to rule on motion to amend dismissal entry after dismissing case—Court of appeals correctly dismissed appellant's mandamus claim against appellees because appellant had adequate remedy in ordinary course of law in form of a defamation action to obtain relief regarding allegedly false statements made by prosecutor—Court of appeals' dismissal of petition affirmed.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.