Skip to main content
· 5/30/1997

State Ex Rel. Conley v. Hill

Citations

  • 487 S.E.2d 344
  • 199 W. Va. 686
  • 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 89

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the burden is placed on defendant in DUI eases to raise statutory variances in defense to sentence enhancement
  • “Although this ease was brought and granted as a petition for mandamus, we choose to treat this matter as a writ of prohibition.” (citations omitted)
  • previous driving under the influence conviction in Ohio may, depending on the facts of the conviction, be used for enhancement in West Virginia
  • “Although this case was brought and granted as a petition for mandamus, we choose to treat this matter as a writ of prohibition. See State ex rel. Ranger Fuel Corp. v. Lilly, 165 W.Va. 98, 100, 267 S.E.2d 435, 436 (1980
  • “Although this case was brought and granted as a petition for mandamus, we choose to treat this matter as a writ of prohibition. See State ex rel. Ranger Fuel Corp. v. Lilly, 165 W.Va. 98, 100, 267 S.E.2d 435, 436 (1980

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Workman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.