State ex rel. Conery v. St. Paul
Citations
- 110 La. 995
- 35 So. 261
- 1903 La. LEXIS 737
Syllabus
<p>CURATOR — ACTION FOR REMOVAL-CONSENT OF JUDGE — MANDAMUS.</p> <p>1. The discretion of the judge, under article 1016, Code Prac., with regard to granting or refusing to an nndereurator authorization to commence an action for the removal of the curator, is confined to the sufficiency of the ground set forth in the application. Where the grounds are such that there can he no two opinions as to their sufficiency, and they are duly supported by the oath of the undercurator, the judge is bound to grant the authorization, and, if he refuses, his action may be controlled by mandamus.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The party seeking a stay generally faces a difficult burden.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.