· 5/31/2005
State ex rel. Coffman v. Indus. Comm.
Citations
- 105 Ohio St. 3d 1567
- 828 N.E.2d 640
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[w]e are then compelled to fall back upon the remaining portion of the description”
- stating rule regarding admissibility of such extrinsic evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.