State ex rel. Clyatt v. Hocker
Citations
- 39 Fla. 477
Syllabus
<p>• CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — OFFICE AND OFFICER -STATE OFFICER — CHAPTER 4539 LAWS APPROVED JUNE 5, 1897, CREATING A STATE BOARD OF LEGAL EXAMINERS DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL.</p> <p>.1. The term “office” implies a delegation cf a portion of the sovereign power to, and possession ot it by, the person filling the office, a public office being an agency for the State, and the person v hose duty it is to perform the agency being a public-officer. The term embraces the idea of tenure, duration and duties, and has respect to a public trust to be exercised in behalf of government, and not to a merely transient, occasional or incidental employment. A person in the service of the government who derives his position from a duly and legally authorized election or appointment, whose duties are continuous in their nature and defined by rules prescribed by government, and not by contract, consisting of the exercise of important public powers, trusts or duties, as a part of the regular administration of -the government, the place and the duties remaining, though the incumbent dies or is changed; every office in the constitutional meaning of the term implying an authority to exercise some portion of the sovereign power, either in making, executing or administering the laws. A State officer is one who falls within this definition and whose field for the exercise of his jurisdiction, duties and powers is co-extensive with the limits of the State and extends to every part of it.</p> <p>2. Chapter 4539 laws approved June 5, 1897, entitled: “An Act toSeguíate Admissions to the Bar of this State, to Create a Board of Legal Examiners, and to provide for a Uniform System of Legal Examinations,” held, to be unconstitutional and void because it creates State officers in the Board of Legal Examiners therein provided for, and fails to provide for their election by the people or appointment by the Governor, as required by the Constitution, but makes them appointive by the Supreme Court, contrary t
Judges: Taylok
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State ex rel. Holloway v. SheatsSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-12-11· cited 113×
- State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of EqualizersSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-11-20· cited 78×
- Blackburn v. BroreinSupreme Court of Florida· 1954-01-22· cited 57×
- Attorney General v. TillinghastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-11-23· cited 55×
- Sibert v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1922-12-15· cited 53×
- State ex rel. Clarkson v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-18· cited 51×
- Winsor v. HuntArizona Supreme Court· 1926-02-10· cited 46×
- State ex rel. Bonsteel v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-02-10· cited 44×
- Barr v. WattsSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-12-08· cited 31×
- Murphy v. MacKSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-03-02· cited 31×
- Zimmerman v. Douglas County HospitalNebraska Supreme Court· 1997-05-30· cited 30×
- White v. FletcherSupreme Court of Florida· 1956-10-24· cited 27×
- State ex rel. Swearingen v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida· 1920-01-26· cited 27×
- State v. PraterNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1922-07-08· cited 27×
- Petition State Bar Association Re: Proposed Court RulesSupreme Court of Florida· 1938-01-08· cited 23×
- Curry v. HammondSupreme Court of Florida· 1944-02-08· cited 17×
- State ex rel. Buford v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-04-28· cited 16×
- Westlake v. MerrittSupreme Court of Florida· 1923-01-10· cited 15×
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. HilburnSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-07-09· cited 14×
- In Re Advisory Opinion to the GovernorSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-02-18· cited 13×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bunn v. People ex rel. LaflinIllinois Supreme Court· 1867-09-15· cited 52×
- Bradford v. Justices of Inferior CourtSupreme Court of Georgia· 1862-06-15· cited 36×
- Ex parte YaleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1864-07-01· cited 34×
- In re the Oaths to be taken by Attorneys & CounsellorsNew York Supreme Court· 1823-01-15· cited 30×
- Seymour v. EllisonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors· 1823-09-15· cited 25×
- In re the Executive Communication of the 2d Day of June, A. D. 1870Supreme Court of Florida· 1870-07-01· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Attorney-General v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 1876-12-15· cited 13×
- People v. HayesNew York Supreme Court· 1852-11-15· cited 12×
- Lindsey v. Attorney-GeneralMississippi Supreme Court· 1857-10-15· cited 11×
- Porter v. PillsburyNew York Supreme Court· 1855-07-15· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.