Skip to main content
· 6/23/2022

State ex rel. Cleveland Metro. School Dist. v. Indus. Comm.

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2150

Syllabus

Commission did not abuse its discretion when it granted TTD. Because there was conflicting medical evidence before the Commission, the Commission was only required to state the evidence on which it relied and to briefly explain why the claimant was not entitled to TTD compensation. Commission was not required to explain why it rejected the conflicting medical evidence. Objection overruled writ denied.

Judges: Jamison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.