Skip to main content
· 6/6/2012

STATE EX REL. CITY OF PROVIDENCE v. Auger

Citations

  • 44 A.3d 1218
  • 2012 WL 2023172
  • 2012 R.I. LEXIS 72

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding City of Providence’s ordinance governing volume of radios, television sets, and similar devices and noting that ordinance’s standard of “reasonableness” is one that a plethora of courts have upheld as not void for vagueness
  • “When we review a challenge to a statute or ordinance, we begin with a presumption that the enactment is constitutional.”
  • “When we review a challenge to a statute or ordinance, we begin with a presumption that the enactment is constitutional.”
  • ordinance carries presumption that enactment was constitutional

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaherty, Goldberg, Indeglia, Robinson, Suttell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.