State ex rel. Cicoria v. Corgiat
Citations
- 50 Wash. 95
- 96 P. 689
- 1908 Wash. LEXIS 673
Syllabus
<p>Mandamus — Parties—Name of Plaintiff — Pleadings — Amendment. Under Bal. Code, § 5738, providing that a party prosecuting a special proceeding may he known as the plaintiff and the adverse party as the defendant, it is not error to refuse to quash a proceeding commenced in the name of the real party in interest, instead of in the name of the state on his relation according to sanctioned practice, especially where the plaintiff was required to amend the complaint to cure the objection made.</p> <p>Same — Proceedings—Summons and Complaint. A mandamus proceeding may be commenced by the filing and service of a summons and complaint, rather than by motion and affidavit.</p> <p>Beneficial Associations — Membership — Expulsion — Notice of Hearing. A mutual benefit society has no power to expel a member without giving him notice and an opportunity to be heard.</p> <p>Appeal — Preservation of Grounds — Findings—Necessity—Mandamus. Error cannot be assigned in the failure of the court to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in mandamus proceedings, where no request therefor was made below.</p> <p>Beneficial Associations — Revision of Acts — Jurisdiction of Courts. The courts are compelled to revise acts of beneficial societies where pecuniary and property rights have been illegally ahridged or invaded.</p>
Judges: Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pratt v. Amalgamated Ass'n of Street & Electric Railway Employees of AmericaUtah Supreme Court· 1917-05-08· cited 17×
- Johnson v. International of the United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America, Local Union No. 971Nevada Supreme Court· 1930-05-21· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Adams v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court· 1913-08-07· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Rowland v. Seattle Baseball Ass'nWashington Supreme Court· 1910-12-06· cited 7×
- Tolbert v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaWashington Supreme Court· 1915-01-07· cited 5×
- State ex rel. Butterworth v. FraterWashington Supreme Court· 1924-08-14· cited 3×
- Joseph Mazzini Society v. CorgiatWashington Supreme Court· 1911-04-24· cited 3×
- Peoples Savings Bank v. First National BankWashington Supreme Court· 1918-05-11· cited 1×
- State ex rel. Prudential Savings & Loan Ass'n v. MartinWashington Supreme Court· 1918-04-24
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Otto v. ProtectiveCalifornia Supreme Court· 1888-03-21· cited 65×
- State ex rel. Weinberg v. Pacific Brewing & Malting Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1899-09-27· cited 29×
- Von Arx v. San Francisco Gruetli VereinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-07-20· cited 25×
- Dubcich v. Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United WorkmenWashington Supreme Court· 1903-12-29· cited 17×
- Slayton v. FeltWashington Supreme Court· 1905-09-06· cited 12×
- Kelly v. Grand Circle Women of WoodcraftWashington Supreme Court· 1905-12-13· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.