Skip to main content
· 12/5/1848

State ex rel. Chew v. Youmans

Citations

  • 1 Ind. 217
  • 1 Smith & H. 172

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • using definitional analysis to conclude that “specific reference” requires that GST tax “must be explicitly mentioned.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.