State ex rel. Chappuis v. Marmouget
Citations
- 104 La. 1
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>An application to one of the Judges of the Supreme Court for writs of certiorari and prohibition directed to a recorder of the city of New Orleans, will be dismissed, but without prejudice when the recorder, in answer to a rule to show cause why the writs should not issue, announces his intention to discontinue certain proceedings which were made the basis of the application and charged to be violative of relator’s rights under a suspensive appeal then pending in the Supreme Court.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the State has failed to provide any basis other than a generalized interest in consumer protection, which the court concludes is too abstract to provide an appropriate benchmark.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.