Oregon Supreme Court· 1/20/1960
State Ex Rel Chapman v. Appling
Citations
- 348 P.2d 759
- 220 Or. 41
- 1960 Ore. LEXIS 363
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court had “recognized in a number of cases that arguments in the official Voters’ Pamphlet relative to measures submit- ted to the people may be resorted to as an aid to construc- tion” and collecting cases
- noting, by reference to Livesley, that “payment of a poll tax could not, agreeably to the constitution, be made a qualification for voters”
- “This court has recognized in a number of cases that arguments in the official Voter’s Pamphlet relative to measures submitted to the people may be resorted to as an aid to construction.”
- \This court has recognized in a number of cases that arguments in the official Voter's Pamphlet relative to measures submitted to the people may be resorted to as an aid to construction.\
- statute concerning compensation of certain state officials held unconstitutional
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lusk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lipscomb v. State Bd. of Higher Ed.Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-04-19· cited 28×
- Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court· 1988-05-17· cited 25×
- City of Las Vegas v. AckermanNevada Supreme Court· 1969-07-31· cited 23×
- Northwest Natural Gas Co. v. FrankOregon Supreme Court· 1982-07-27· cited 21×
- State Ex Rel. Overhulse v. ApplingOregon Supreme Court· 1961-04-07· cited 18×
- Rogers v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 14×
- Baker v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 11×
- State Ex Rel. Boe v. StraubOregon Supreme Court· 1978-05-23· cited 9×
- Knopp v. Griffin-ValadeOregon Supreme Court· 2024-02-01· cited 5×
- Dennehy v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court· 1987-01-09· cited 2×
- Wittemyer v. City of PortlandMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-08· cited 2×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. OtteyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1936-03-31· cited 106×
- Carter v. Commission on Qualifications of Judicial AppointmentsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-08-15· cited 91×
- Collins v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1944-10-02· cited 66×
- Peay v. NolanTennessee Supreme Court· 1928-06-30· cited 63×
- Fouts v. Hood RiverOregon Supreme Court· 1905-07-03· cited 27×
- State v. CochranOregon Supreme Court· 1909-10-12· cited 27×
- State Ex Rel. Powers v. WelchOregon Supreme Court· 1953-06-24· cited 16×
- Livesley v. LitchfieldOregon Supreme Court· 1905-11-27· cited 16×
- School Dist. 1, Mult. Co. v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court· 1955-06-08· cited 14×
- Keith v. Funding BoardTennessee Supreme Court· 1912-12-15· cited 13×
- Whitthorne v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court· 1927-04-09· cited 8×
- City of Portland v. BINGHAMOregon Supreme Court· 1957-02-27· cited 4×
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1949-02-16· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.