State Ex Rel. Chamberlain v. Martinco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating in dictum that the IAD “provides that the receiving state is required to bring the convict to trial within 180 days after receiving a request from him”
• in habeas corpus hearing to challenge extradition, the asylum state cannot take cognizance of a claim that the charge in the demanding state is invalid for failure to comply with speedy trial requirements of IAD

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).