Skip to main content
· 9/27/2006

State ex rel. C.H.

Citations

  • 939 So. 2d 732
  • 6 La.App. 3 Cir. 336
  • 2006 La. App. LEXIS 2163
  • 2006 WL 2773840

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • first prong satisfied despite incomplete factual statement in written request when court aware of legal and factual basis for request via off record chambers conference and on record colloquy
  • “ ‘ “[i]n viewing evidence which could yield contrary inferences, the jury is not barred from drawing those inferences consistent with guilt and is not required to draw only those inferences consistent with innocence” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cooks, Gremillion, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.