State ex rel. C.C.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that an alien must receive “notice in accordance with [8 U.S.C. § 1229(a)]” (quoting 8 U.S.C. § 1229a(b)(5)(C)(ii))
• explaining “Niz Chavez v. Garland made plain that the § 1229(a) notice requirements must be included in a single document”
• allowing relief following a defective NTA under Niz-Chavez but not Pereira
• “Under Niz-Chavez’s interpretation of § 1229(a), we . . . require a single document containing the required information in the in absentia context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).