State ex rel. Cazenave v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• case decided under prior Rule 9; the abstract was not so deficient as to call for an affirmance under Rule 9(d)
• the abstract was not so deficient as to call for an affirmance under Rule 9(d)
• civil service commission's dismissal of police chief for committing fiscal improprieties upheld

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).