State ex rel. Cain v. Judge of the Sixth District Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Defendants’ argument that the claims lack commonality among the class because they challenge systemic delays, not individual release decisions
• “[T]his Court is hard-pressed to see how setting aside an unlawful practice could be against the public interest.”
• defendant “cannot suffer any harm from an injunction that terminates an unlawful practice”
• “To warrant a preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs need not show that there is a likelihood of success on the merits of all of their claims for relief. Rather, Plaintiffs need to show a likelihood of success on the merits of at least one of their claims.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).