Skip to main content
· 10/31/2008

State ex rel. C. H.

Citations

  • 994 So. 2d 544
  • 2008 La. LEXIS 2943
  • 2008 WL 5111297

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming decision to grant location approval that ‘‘was subject to certain conditions, one of which was approval from the defendant of the site development of the property as required by the city zoning regulations’’
  • applicant’s oral request to table application for site plan approval did not constitute consent to extension of time under § 8-7d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.