State ex rel. Byk v. Indus. Comm.
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 136
Syllabus
The magistrate did not err in the conclusion that the deceased injured worker and/or his estate lacked standing to bring the mandamus action as the workers' compensation claim had abated upon the injured worker's death, and the surviving spouse of the deceased injured worker cannot pursue the mandamus action on the deceased injured worker's behalf but has a remedy in her ongoing R.C. 4123.60 proceedings. Petition for writ of mandamus dismissed.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Manns v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1988-10-26· cited 50×
- State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-11-14· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Nicholson v. Copperweld Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-12-18· cited 23×
- State v. Ramsey (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-03· cited 16×
- State ex rel. Navistar, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-03-04· cited 16×
- State ex rel. Johnston v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court· 2001-08-15· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Hamlin v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1993-12-08· cited 8×
- State ex rel. White v. Internatl. House of PancakesOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-06· cited 3×
- Zebrasky v. Disc. Drug Mart, Inc.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2017-06-22· cited 1×
Other cases named State ex rel. Byk v. Indus. Comm.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.