State ex rel. Burge v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining there would be irreparable harm due to the potential of an inconsistent ruling in a separate proceeding which could affect the ability of the family court to equitably divide marital assets
• “We dismiss the petition directed at the dissolution of the lis pendens as moot, because the lis pendens at issue expired on June 21, 2006, one year after it was filed.”
• “We dismiss the petition directed at the dissolution of the lis pendens as moot, because the lis pendens at issue expired on June 21, 2006, one year after it was filed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).