State ex rel. Burd v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court refused to hold that the words “the right to use the rents and profits of said lands for their suppo rt and mainte nance” ren dered the life estate unimpeachable for waste, but held life tenants were entitled to use good farming practices
• tenant ’s changes were consistent with good husband ry, which would preserve or enhance the value of the land, and no liability for waste is found, but “[a]ny material deviation from good tree farming practice would render the life tenants liable to the remainderman for waste”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).