Skip to main content
· 5/3/1983

State Ex Rel. Brown v. Georgeoff

Citations

  • 562 F. Supp. 1300
  • 19 ERC 1113
  • 13 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20457
  • 19 ERC (BNA) 1113
  • 1983 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that CERCLA is not a remedial statute because it creates an entirely new procedure for enforcing substantive rights
  • noting that while the use of past tense may apply to pre-enactment conduct, it is not sufficient on its own to conclude that Congress intended retroactive application
  • finding sufficient evidence that Congress intended CERCLA to apply retroactively to override the presumption against retroactivity
  • Investigatory costs are not within the definition of response costs. Section 9607(a)(4)(A) requires that the complaint sufficiently allege costs incurred.
  • State successfully brought § 9607(a)(4)(A) action to recover costs of cleaning up private dumpsite
  • declaratory judgment available to State in suit filed prior to SARA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.