State ex rel. Brewster v. Piper
Citations
- 103 Kan. 794
- 176 P. 626
- 1918 Kan. LEXIS 386
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>1. Justice op Peace — Jurisdiction—No Authority to Grant Paroles, or Remit Jail Sentence. A justice of the peace is without jurisdiction to grant a parole, and has no jurisdiction to remit a jail sentence, and such parole or remittance of jail sentence is a nullity.</p> <p>2. Habeas Corpus — Jurisdiction of Probate Court — Unexecuted Commitment. A probate judge is without jurisdiction in habeas corpus to discharge a petitioner from the custody of an officer who holds the petitioner by virtue of an unexecuted judgment and commitment issued by another court of competent jurisdiction.</p> <p>3. Same — Termination of Term of Commitment. The term of a commitment to. a county jail does not expire until the sentence of imprisonment recited in the commitment has been fully executed-.</p> <p>4. Criminal Law — Delay in Execution of Jail Sentence Not Unreasonable. Assuming, but without deciding, that an unreasonable delay in the execution of a judgment imposing a jail sentence will altogether relieve a convicted person from liability to serve such jail sentence, the circumstances of the present cases, where the jail sentences were imposed in February and the commitments were not issued until the following November, examined, and held that, while the lapse of time was unusual, it was not unreasonable, that the commitments should be executed, and that mandamus may issue to accomplish that purpose.</p> <p>5. Same — Original Sentence of Commitment Should be Executed — Writ of Mandamus Should Issue. Three persons pleaded guilty to violations of the prohibitory law before a justice of the peace, and were sentenced to jail and to pay fines and costs. Later the justice paroled the defendants and remitted the jail sentences when the fines and costs were paid. The justice of the peace resigned, and his successor issued commitments for their incarceration. The probate judge discharged them on writs of habeas corpus. Held, that the justice of the peace was
Judges: Dawson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas· 1931-04-11· cited 28×
- State ex rel. Boynton v. Wheat Farming Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1933-06-10· cited 22×
- State v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of Kansas· 1964-03-07· cited 20×
- Frontier Ditch Co. v. Chief Engineer of the Division of Water ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-07-26· cited 19×
- State v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas· 1923-04-16· cited 17×
- State v. HastySupreme Court of Kansas· 1966-01-22· cited 5×
- In re KrigSupreme Court of Kansas· 1919-12-06· cited 5×
- City of Goodland v. BairSupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-11-30· cited 5×
- In re JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1920-06-05· cited 4×
- State v. MaddenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1925-07-11· cited 4×
- Mick v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-05-03· cited 3×
- Pinaire v. BeaverSupreme Court of Kansas· 1948-03-25· cited 2×
- Van Valkenburg v. MackeySupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-12-11· cited 1×
- In re EgnatikSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-01-09
- Habeas Corpus of Saparito v. HelmanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1927-12-10
- Blaylock v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas· 1963-04-06
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1898-05-24· cited 78×
- State v. NagleSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-05-12· cited 33×
- State ex rel. Dawson v. SappSupreme Court of Kansas· 1912-07-06· cited 31×
- Ex parte VanceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-07-15· cited 22×
- State ex rel. McGill v. GerhardsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-01-06· cited 19×
- In re TerrySupreme Court of Kansas· 1905-04-08· cited 18×
- State v. MassaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1913-06-07· cited 16×
- Sims v. KennedySupreme Court of Kansas· 1903-07-10· cited 11×
- In re WillSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-03-11· cited 6×
- State v. CallahanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1914-11-14· cited 5×
- Vorce v. OppenheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1899-01-15· cited 2×
- In re MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1916-04-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.