STATE, EX REL. BREEDING v. Seay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there was an insufficient ‘manifestation of an intent [by Respondent] to conduct a revocation hearing . . .’ before the expiration of Relator's probation on August 18, 2006,” even though the court suspended the offender’s probation on June 2, 2006
• finding that the lower court did not make every reasonable effort to hold a probation revocation hearing when defendant appeared twice during his probation, but the court continued the hearing until one year after his probation ended

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).