State ex rel. Breazeale v. Frank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• agreeing with Bank of Hawaii ruling and concluding that “overdraft fees constitute discrete harms that do not constitute a single transaction providing for recurring transfers”
• \This Court agrees with the reasoning in Smith ... [that] overdraft fees constitute discrete harms that do not constitute a single transaction providing for recurring transfers.\
• “[N]either case considered the differences between preauthorized recurring transfers and non-recurring overdraft fees. Rather, both cases simply apply the rule for recurring transactions to non- recurring overdraft charge without analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).