Skip to main content
· 12/17/1999

State ex rel. Bray v. State

Citations

  • 751 So. 2d 877
  • 1999 La. LEXIS 3535
  • 1999 WL 1279419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that joint voluntary dismissal of dissolution action left the parties “as if the action had never been brought”
  • noting that “[t]his is not a case where, after the initiation of a paternity action, a previously filed dissolution action continued on its way to a final judgment.”
  • noting that \the knowledge of paternity acquired by DNA testing\ has become a consideration the law must include when balancing the competing interests in this type of case
  • characterizing this language in Lander as dicta and stating that “[a] marriage is either intact or it is not”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Grant, Johnson, Lemmon, Writ

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.