State ex rel. Brawford v. Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that serious bodily injury is an element of class A kidnapping
• holding that serious bodily injury is an element of class A kidnapping
• noting that where defendant had not met his burden of showing that the out-of-court identifications were impermissibly suggestive, it was not necessary to reach the second step of the analysis
• holding that “[a] defendant is guilty of the class A felony of kidnapping only if the jury finds that the evidence establishes both the class B felony of kidnapping as defined in RSA 633:1,1, and the elements of a class A felony set forth in RSA 633:1, II”
• no inquiry into possible prejudice from ruling allowing State to impeach by prior conviction where defendant does not take stand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).